Re: Lifecycle of PostgreSQL releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, CAJ CAJ <pguser(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lifecycle of PostgreSQL releases
Date: 2007-03-15 17:59:59
Message-ID: 12783.1173981599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> 1. More people will run 8.3 than 8.2. Why? Because 8.3 will be in the
> wild as current stable longer than 8.2.

Oh, gimme a break, Josh. A year or more from now that argument would be
relevant, but unless you are going to counsel your customers not to
update till mid-2008, it's completely irrelevant to whether it makes
sense to update now. If you *are* going to tell them to wait until
8.3.4 or so (which I can see an argument for, if you don't like being
an early adopter), won't you then be in exactly the same position that
"8.4 is just around the corner"?

Your other four points are mere rehashings of that one.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-03-15 18:19:47 Re: plperl function called > once in cascading triggers
Previous Message Robin Ericsson 2007-03-15 17:58:41 Re: simple coordinate system