| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: _bt_parent_deletion_safe() isn't safe |
| Date: | 2010-07-04 02:15:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1278209602-sup-1299@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie jul 02 22:02:59 -0400 2010:
> Possibly. I was planning to go back and study that code a bit more ---
> I have a feeling that there might be some kind of rare concurrency bug
> involved in btree page deletion. But I've been up to my rear in
> other alligators for the past several weeks.
Judging from the evidence I've seen, I'm fairly sure that there *is* a
concurrency bug somewhere in that code.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-04 02:37:28 | Re: reassign owned to change the ownership for op class and family |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-03 22:41:22 | Re: Why are these modules built without respecting my LDFLAGS? |