Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
Date: 2018-03-29 13:26:50
Message-ID: 12775.1522330010@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Presumably also cursor_to_xmlschema. I also found some more
> suspicious brin and gin modifying functions. So I think the list of
> functions that needs to be marked 'u' so far is:

> * binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
> * pg_import_system_collations
> * brin_summarize_range
> * brin_summarize_new_values
> * brin_desummarize_range
> * gin_clean_pending_list
> * cursor_to_xml
> * cursor_to_xmlschema

> Has anyone got anything else?

There are some tsquery functions that execute user-supplied queries,
and so need to be 'u' on the same grounds as the cursor_to_xml cases.
I haven't checked to be sure if they are already so, but was planning
to do so before considering this matter closed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2018-03-29 13:33:09 Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-03-29 13:15:10 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS