From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension |
Date: | 2018-03-29 13:26:50 |
Message-ID: | 12775.1522330010@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Presumably also cursor_to_xmlschema. I also found some more
> suspicious brin and gin modifying functions. So I think the list of
> functions that needs to be marked 'u' so far is:
> * binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
> * pg_import_system_collations
> * brin_summarize_range
> * brin_summarize_new_values
> * brin_desummarize_range
> * gin_clean_pending_list
> * cursor_to_xml
> * cursor_to_xmlschema
> Has anyone got anything else?
There are some tsquery functions that execute user-supplied queries,
and so need to be 'u' on the same grounds as the cursor_to_xml cases.
I haven't checked to be sure if they are already so, but was planning
to do so before considering this matter closed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2018-03-29 13:33:09 | Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-03-29 13:15:10 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |