Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
Date: 2010-06-23 19:31:23
Message-ID: 1277321259-sup-5942@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Excerpts from Devrim GUNDUZ's message of lun jun 21 23:55:41 -0400 2010:

> IIRC, it does not compile against newer PostgreSQL releases and it is
> not under development right now.

It compiles with 9.0 just fine (and earlier releases too, though I
didn't bother to test anything earlier than 8.2). It failed to compile
with PHP 5.3, but I fixed that yesterday. It now works with both 5.2
and 5.3; it should work with 5.1 too (it used to) but I didn't test
that, because it's unsupported.

There hasn't been much development lately, but it works. Some newer
features of Postgres functions are, of course, not supported, but stuff
like named params, triggers and SRF are there.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-06-23 19:35:44 Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
Previous Message Jamie Kahgee 2010-06-23 19:21:51 copy/duplicate database schemas