From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? |
Date: | 1999-02-07 22:51:08 |
Message-ID: | 12773.918427868@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> Don't remember what's all fixed between v6.4.2 and now.
> Does anyone else know about bugs that are still in the REL6_4
> branch and could be fixed without adding features?
I just checked in the ". conftest.sh" -> ". ./conftest.sh" fix to
configure, which several people have complained of (6.4.2 fails
if "." is not in your PATH at configure time).
We have to be pretty careful with these back-rev patches, since they
typically aren't going to get much testing in the back version's
CVS tree. So I'm leery of applying anything that hasn't been tested
for a while in the development branch.
For example, the patch I just applied to CURRENT to link libpgtcl.so
with -lcrypt perhaps ought to go into REL6_4 --- but I'm afraid to do
that until we verify that it works on a variety of platforms. It fixes
things on teo's Linux box but I worry that it might actually break things
elsewhere.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | gjerde | 1999-02-07 23:01:09 | RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-02-07 22:33:18 | RE: [HACKERS] libpq++ |