| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] remove deprecated v8.2 containment operators |
| Date: | 2020-11-30 19:03:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1276941.1606763026@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> Status update for a commitfest entry.
> The commitfest is nearing the end and this thread is "Waiting on
> Author". As far as I see we don't have a patch here and discussion is a
> bit stuck.
> So, I am planning to return it with feedback. Any objections?
AFAICS, the status is
(1) core-code changes are committed;
(2) proposed edits to contrib modules need significant rework;
(3) there was also a bit of discussion about inventing a mechanism
to prod users to update out-of-date extensions.
Now, (3) is far outside the scope of this patch, and I do not
think it should block finishing (2). We need a new patch for (2),
but there's no real doubt as to what it should contain -- Justin
just needs to turn the crank.
You could either move this to the next CF in state WoA, or
close it RWF. But the patch did make progress in this CF,
so I'd tend to lean to the former.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-11-30 19:06:12 | Re: [PATCH] remove deprecated v8.2 containment operators |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-30 18:54:47 | Re: 回复: [PATCH] BUG FIX: Core dump could happen when VACUUM FULL in standalone mode |