From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "P(dot) Caillaud" <peufeu(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: LLVM / clang |
Date: | 2010-06-10 08:55:48 |
Message-ID: | 1276160148.32193.7.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2010-06-08 at 12:12 +0200, P. Caillaud wrote:
> I'd like to experiment on compiling postgres with LLVM (either llvm-gcc or
> clang) on Linux, is it supported ? Where should I start ?
The way to choose a compiler is
./configure CC=your-cc ...other...options...
We support a fair amount of non-GCC compilers, so supporting one or two
more should be possible.
Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration
with glibc might be needed. Building with llvm-gcc works fine, but I
understand that using llvm-gcc with native code generation isn't all
that different from using gcc itself, so that's not a surprising result.
The only issue is that the float8 regression test fails, so it is
apparently not *exactly* the same.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-10 09:10:37 | Re: InvalidXLogRecPtr in docs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-06-10 08:49:33 | Re: LLVM / clang |