Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.
Date: 2010-06-08 18:58:28
Message-ID: 1276023483-sup-5852@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Jeff Amiel's message of mar jun 08 14:19:02 -0400 2010:

> " It seems preferable to configure autovacuum to avoid vacuum
> Slony-I-managed configuration tables. "
>
>
> Hmmm....I don't do this.
> Surely this is not relative to my corrupt indexes....2 attempted vacuums on
> same indexes?

Pretty unlikely.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Colson 2010-06-08 18:58:39 Re: Queues Problem
Previous Message Andy Colson 2010-06-08 18:50:58 Re: Some insight on the proper SQL would be appreciated

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-06-08 19:03:40 Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-08 18:41:25 Re: Parameters of GiST indexes