Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Date: 2010-06-03 23:11:05
Message-ID: 1275606522-sup-7982@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Chris Browne's message of jue jun 03 16:21:35 -0400 2010:

> What this offers is *SOME* idea of how much updating work a particular
> transaction did. It's a bit worse than you suggest:
>
> - If replication triggers have captured tuples, those would get
> counted.
>
> - TOAST updates might lead to extra updates being counted.
>
> But back to where you started, I'd anticipate 7 inserts, 7 deletes,
> and 7 updates being counted as something around 21 updates.
>
> And if that included 5 TOAST changes, it might bump up to 26.
>
> If there were replication triggers in place, that might bump the count
> up to 45 (which I chose arbitrarily).

Why not send separate numbers of tuple inserts/updates/deletes, which we
already have from pgstats?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-06-03 23:21:16 Re: 9.0 release notes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-03 23:02:00 Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay