Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-06-02 16:41:53
Message-ID: 1275496913.21465.2704.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 14:40 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Uh, we have three days before we package 9.0beta2. It would be good if
> we could decide on the max_standby_delay issue soon.

I've heard something from Heikki, not from anyone else. Those comments
amount to "lets replace max_standby_delay with max_apply_delay".

Got a beta idea?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-06-02 16:59:05 Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-06-02 15:47:22 Re: proposal - custom format for date, timestamp