From: | alvherre <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to pass around collation information |
Date: | 2010-05-28 17:05:34 |
Message-ID: | 1275065149-sup-1631@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of vie may 28 12:27:52 -0400 2010:
> Option 2, invent some new mechanism that accompanies a datum or a type
> whereever it goes. Kind of like typmod, but not really. Then the
> collation information would presumably be made available to functions
> through the fmgr interface. The binary representation of data values
> stays the same.
Is the collation a property of the datum, or one of the comparison?
If the latter, should it be really be made a sidecar of a datum, or
would it make more sense to attach it to the operation being performed?
I wonder if instead of trying to pass it down multiple layers till
bttextcmp and further down, it would make more sense to set a global
variable somewhere in the high levels, and only have it checked in
varstr_cmp.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-05-28 17:22:05 | Re: How to pass around collation information |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-05-28 16:45:44 | Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature |