From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Hammond <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: missing chunk 0 for toast value ... |
Date: | 2011-10-26 14:39:34 |
Message-ID: | 12734.1319639974@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Hammond
> <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> [ pokes around for a bit ... ] Hmm, can you say how the failing query
>>> was submitted, exactly? I'm wondering if it came in via simple Query
>>> (PQexec) or extended-query protocol (anything with parameters).
>> The command was sent from a python via django-1.2.1 using psycopg2-2.2.1
> PQexec then.
Thanks for the followup. My current theory is that that's unrelated,
though --- it now seems that this is just a race condition in the use of
toasted pg_statistic entries. See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-10/msg01366.php
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-26 14:42:19 | Re: pglesslog for Postgres 9.1.1 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-26 14:15:59 | Re: Large Rows |