| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby |
| Date: | 2010-05-02 14:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1272809713.4161.31566.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server
This can definitely use some improvement though not yet.
I've documented what's there a little better and fixed up the test
results.
Thanks for your input in this area.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-02 14:30:00 | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-02 14:12:25 | Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |