| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: extended operator classes vs. type interfaces |
| Date: | 2010-04-22 02:36:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1271903760.11956.176.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 23:18 -0700, Scott Bailey wrote:
> Well I've been doing a lot of work with range abstract data types in
> Oracle lately. And I've got to say that the OO features in Oracle make
> it really nice. Of course its Oracle, so its like a half baked OO in
> cobol syntax, lol. But I for one think it would be great if Postgres had
> object data types that had methods and could be subclassed.
That's interesting. I think the most critical piece of that is
"subclassing" in the sense of a type interface.
There have already been a couple threads about type interfaces:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg01403.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-04/msg00443.php
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-22 05:30:40 | Re: libpq connectoin redirect |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-22 02:27:26 | Re: don't allow walsender to consume superuser_reserved_connection slots, or during shutdown |