From: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
Date: | 2018-11-09 17:23:42 |
Message-ID: | 1268584c-cd53-386d-c519-0681e92532c9@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.11.2018 22:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Nov-08, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
>> Before doing any other refactoring of projection indexes I want to attach
>> small bug fix patch which
>> fixes the original problem (SIGSEGV) and also disables recheck_on_update by
>> default.
>> As Laurenz has suggested, I replaced boolean recheck_on_update option with
>> "on","auto,"off" (default).
> I think this causes an ABI break for GenericIndexOpts. Not sure to what
> extent that is an actual problem (i.e. how many modules were compiled
> with 11.0 that are gonna be reading that struct with later Pg), but I
> think it should be avoided anyhow.
>
Ok, I reverted back my change of reach_on_update option type.
Now if reach_on_update option is not explicitly specified, then
decision is made based on the expression cost.
Patches becomes very small and fix only error in comparison of index
tuple values.
--
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
projection-11.patch | text/x-patch | 4.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2018-11-09 17:43:24 | Re: speeding up planning with partitions |
Previous Message | Daniel Verite | 2018-11-09 17:23:10 | Re: Alternative to \copy in psql modelled after \g |