Re: Getting to beta1

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting to beta1
Date: 2010-03-13 16:58:55
Message-ID: 1268499535.3825.3948.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 22:28 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Where are we in getting to beta1? I know people are looking to me for
> 9.0 release notes and I will have them done in about a week, but what
> about open issues? I don't see many on the main 9.0 open items page:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items#Bugs
>
> The list has been reduced greatly in the past week. What about HS/SR
> open items?

I have these things on my list

* Minor page xid bug fix
* btree delete standby-side derivation of xid
* review of StartupXLog issue, on open items list, has an effect on HS

I expect to be finished with those by Wed, perhaps Thurs.

Some additional open items on SR

* trigger_file no longer supports "fast" mode. There is no way to
startup server quickly if it has fallen behind, as is currently possible
with 8.4

* There should be a default for "trigger_file" so that you can failover
a server even if this has not been specified.

To me the open items look like at least 2 weeks work on SR, given some
of them will likely need discussion rather than just action.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-13 16:59:02 Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-03-13 16:58:40 Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql