Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue
Date: 2000-11-20 02:31:22
Message-ID: 12683.974687482@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README

> There is no mention of the handling of toasted values for old C functions.

Did you not read to the end?

: To allow old-style dynamic functions to work safely on toastable datatypes,
: the handler for old-style functions will automatically detoast toastable
: arguments before passing them to the old-style function. A new-style
: function is expected to take care of toasted arguments by using the
: standard argument access macros defined above.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-11-20 02:44:27 PG 7.1 pre-beta bug ...
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-11-20 01:00:09 Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue