| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| Date: | 2010-03-10 22:45:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1268261125.3825.2542.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 23:08 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >
> > Time to remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age, I think.
>
> Umm, so what's the bug?
Whether you call it a bug or just an annoyance is debatable, but the
source of it is clear. Given the lack of effectiveness, I propose
removing it.
Would you agree or disagree with the suggested removal?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-10 22:55:17 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-03-10 21:08:44 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-10 22:55:17 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-10 22:42:51 | Re: Access violation from palloc, Visual Studio 2005, C-language function |