From: | Iñigo Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dclements89(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration |
Date: | 2010-03-05 08:20:59 |
Message-ID: | 1267777259.17535.372.camel@deimos |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-sql |
Until now, the only solution that has worked for us is pg_pool, but is
not always possible to use it.
For example, if you use functions or sentences that make use of
timestamp, random, etc it won't be possible to use pg_pool since each
node will have a different value.
If not, it could probably work for you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Clements <dclements89(at)gmail(dot)com>
Reply-to: dclements89(at)gmail(dot)com
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:25:24 +1100
Hi everyone,
I am looking for some Master-Master replication solutions for
PostgreSQL database. Please let me know if you are using one and if
you are happy with the performance.
Thanks
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-03-05 08:25:05 | Re: PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration |
Previous Message | Dave Clements | 2010-03-05 07:25:24 | PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-03-05 08:25:05 | Re: PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration |
Previous Message | Dave Clements | 2010-03-05 07:25:24 | PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration |