From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |
Date: | 2010-02-28 22:15:18 |
Message-ID: | 1267395318.20134.3178.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 03:33 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> I really hope this discussion can say focused on if and how it's
> possible to improve this area, with the goal being to deliver a product
> everyone can be proud of with the full feature set that makes this next
> release a killer one. The features that have managed to all get into
> this release already are fantastic, everyone who contributed should be
> proud of that progress, and it's encouraging that the alpha4 date was
> nailed. It would be easy to descend into finger-pointing for why
> exactly this particular problem is only getting more visibility now, or
> into schedule-oriented commentary suggesting it must be ignored because
> it's too late to do anything about it. I hope everyone appreciates
> wandering that way will not help make PostgreSQL 9.0 a better release.
> This issue is so easy to encounter, and looks so bad when it happens,
> that I feel it could easily lead to an embarrassing situation for the
> community if something isn't done about it before release.
Thanks Greg. It's a great relief for me to hear someone else say this
and to watch a discussion about this important issue unfold.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-02-28 22:38:28 | Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-28 21:58:51 | Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |