Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karl Schnaitter <karlsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Date: 2010-02-24 17:35:57
Message-ID: 1267032957.3752.6512.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 15:52 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:

> We can do
> better with stuff like Heikki's "grouped index tuple" and the
> visibility map which don't interfere with other features as much.

Yes, much better plan. More practical, nearly there.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-24 17:46:06 Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-02-24 17:33:07 Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables