From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Arnaud Betremieux <arnaud(dot)betremieux(at)keyconsulting(dot)fr> |
Subject: | Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full |
Date: | 2010-02-09 21:46:53 |
Message-ID: | 1265752013.17112.18.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:13 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I would like to support encoded text, but I think there are other
> problems. For instance, what if one server has a client_encoding that
> doesn't support some of the glyphs being sent by the notifying backend?
> Then we have a mess, because we can't deliver it.
I was thinking more about this. It seems clear that we want the backend
that issues the notify to only put 7-bit ASCII in the payload.
But if the client sends the letters 'string' as a payload, and the
representation in the server encoding is something other than the normal
7-bit ASCII representation of 'string', it will be incorrect, right?
Looking at the documentation, it appears that all of the server
encodings represent 7-bit ascii characters using the same 7-bit ascii
representation. Is that true?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-09 21:51:05 | Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full |
Previous Message | Etienne Dube | 2010-02-09 21:09:16 | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |