Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] weird bug in rebuilding RPMs

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
To: pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, zhong ming wu <mr(dot)z(dot)m(dot)wu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] weird bug in rebuilding RPMs
Date: 2010-02-08 16:37:00
Message-ID: 1265647020.2162.0.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> But having said that, I don't get the point of trying to build a
> nonstandard installation from the RPM. That seems more or less
> antithetical to most of the design concepts of RPM-based distros;
> and it certainly seems pretty silly if your intent is to transition
> to the standard RPM later.

Right.

Also, I think using _prefix is not supported? Isn't it considered as
relocation of postgresql rpm?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Professional PostgreSQL Services, Training, 24x7 Support
Authors: PostgreSQL RPMs, PITRTools, PostgreSQL Replicator
http://www.commandprompt.com/ XMPP: dgunduz(at)jabber(dot)commandprompt(dot)com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russell Smith 2010-02-09 07:31:11 Re: BUG #5319: recursion in the triggers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-02-08 15:33:06 Re: weird bug in rebuilding RPMs

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-02-08 16:47:57 Re: Multiple buffer cache?
Previous Message erobles 2010-02-08 16:35:21 Re: which the best way to start postgres.