| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn() |
| Date: | 2014-07-23 16:09:11 |
| Message-ID: | 12655.1406131751@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There are several possible methods of doing that, but I think the best
> one is just to leave the SQL-callable C functions in fuzzystrmatch and
> move only the underlying code that supports into core.
I hadn't been paying close attention to this thread, but I'd just assumed
that that would be the approach.
It might be worth introducing new differently-named pg_proc entries for
the same functions in core, but only if we can agree that there are better
names for them than what the extension uses.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MauMau | 2014-07-23 16:17:54 | Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-07-23 15:57:50 | Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn() |