| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C |
| Date: | 2000-02-19 17:01:27 |
| Message-ID: | 12652.950979687@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The longjmp seems to work but I need to test it more. I'm concerned how it
> will work across platforms, esp. Windows (being a POSIX thing). Should
> there be a configure test or can I assume it on every non-WIN32 system?
longjmp predates POSIX by an eon or two. I doubt you need to worry about
it on Unix platforms. (Since we utterly rely on it in the backend,
Postgres wouldn't ever work on a platform without it anyway.)
Less sure about the situation on Windows or Mac, but configure isn't
going to help for those anyway.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-19 17:16:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-19 16:55:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: UESQLC |