From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby and deadlock detection |
Date: | 2010-02-01 10:13:00 |
Message-ID: | 1265019180.13782.11250.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:40 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > The way this would work is if Startup waits on a buffer pin we
> > immediately send out a request to all backends to cancel themselves if
> > they are holding the buffer pin required && waiting on a lock. We then
> > sleep until max_standby_delay. When max_standby_delay = -1 we only sleep
> > until deadlock timeout and then check (on the Startup process).
>
> Should wake up to check for deadlocks after deadlock_timeout also when
> max_standby_delay > deadlock_timeout. max_standby_delay could be hours -
> we want to detect a deadlock sooner than that.
The patch does detect deadlocks sooner that that - "immediately", as
described above.
The simplified logic is
if (MaxStandbyDelay == 0)
immediate time out any buffer pin holders
else if (MaxStandbyDelay == -1)
wait for deadlock_timeout then check for deadlockers
else if (standby_delay > MaxStandbyDelay)
immediate time out on buffer pin
else
{
immediate(*) check for deadlockers
wait for remainder of time then time out any buffer pin holders
}
(*) Doing it this way makes the logic sigalarm handler code easier/more
bug free. The only difference is a potential performance gain from not
running deadlock detection early.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-01 10:14:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Write a WAL record whenever we perform an operation without |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-02-01 10:11:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Write a WAL record whenever we perform an operation without |