| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Axel Waggershauser" <awagger(at)web(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Low throughput of binary inserts from windows to linux |
| Date: | 2006-12-11 15:59:00 |
| Message-ID: | 12645.1165852740@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Axel Waggershauser" <awagger(at)web(dot)de> writes:
> On 12/9/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This has to be a network-level problem. IIRC, there are some threads in
>> our archives discussing possibly-related performance issues seen with
>> Windows' TCP stack.
> I searched the archives but found nothing really enlightening
> regarding my problem. One large thread regarding win32 was related to
> a psql problem related to multiple open handles, other mails referred
> to a "QoS" patch but I could not find more specific information.
Yeah, that's what I couldn't think of the other day. The principal
report was here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-01/msg01231.php
By default, Windows XP installs the QoS Packet Scheduler service.
It is not installed by default on Windows 2000. After I installed
QoS Packet Scheduler on the Windows 2000 machine, the latency
problem vanished.
Now he was talking about a local connection not remote, but it's still
something worth trying.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-11 16:09:18 | Re: Postgresql - Threshold value. |
| Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2006-12-11 15:47:51 | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |