Re: primary key error message

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: primary key error message
Date: 2010-01-22 15:20:09
Message-ID: 1264173609.14009.21.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2010-01-22 at 15:10 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I merely ask that you consider the non-zero cost of such changes as
> well
> as the benefit. Not all change is worthwhile, even if the change can
> be
> made quickly and with little effect on the stability of the software.

Right, that's why I asked for comments, and the comments were clear. :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2010-01-22 15:24:59 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-01-22 15:10:48 Re: primary key error message