Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Date: 2010-01-22 14:32:55
Message-ID: 1264170775.4982.39.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 09:10 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:

> I'm not sure whether you're stating a position that's been agreed to
> by -core or some other group, or just expressing your own opinion, but
> I think feature freeze should be the beginning of the last CommitFest,
> not the end.

Was is declared somewhere before commitfests began? If not, I would
agree with Peter here: Beta is the feature freeze. IIRC it has always
been so.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-22 14:36:39 Re: primary key error message
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-22 14:27:59 Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)