Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full
Date: 2010-01-21 17:21:56
Message-ID: 1264094516.29919.21.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 10:14 +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here's the problem as I see it:
>
> You are writing a lot of true facts but I miss to find a real
> problem... What exactly do you see as a problem?

I worded that in a confusing way, I apologize. My point was that I don't
think we need a lock, because I don't see any situation in which the
notifications would be lost.

> I have been working on simplifying the patch yesterday, I still need
> to adapt comments and review it again but I am planning to post the
> new version tonight. Then we have a common base again to discuss
> further :-)

Sounds good.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-21 17:33:35 Re: quoting psql varible as identifier
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-21 17:19:42 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL