Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-01-17 21:51:17
Message-ID: 1263765077.3642.223.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> > It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a
> timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.
>
> Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send
> such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL.

Is that something you're working on?

Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to
bounce from?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-01-17 21:53:47 Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-17 21:42:39 Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS