Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Date: 2015-12-04 18:33:34
Message-ID: 12637.1449254014@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> I noticed in passing that the role removal documentation should really
> also discuss shared objects (as the DROP OWNED BY reference page does).

If you're speaking of section 20.4, that text is all my fault ... but
I'm not clear on what you think needs to be added? The first DROP OWNED
BY will take care of any privileges on shared objects, so I didn't really
think we need to burden the recipe with that detail.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-12-04 18:52:16 Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-04 18:07:34 Re: Size of Path nodes