| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Typed tables |
| Date: | 2010-01-11 07:00:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1263193202.4609.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2010-01-10 at 15:27 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 1/10/10 2:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tor, 2009-11-05 at 19:24 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> I'm planning to work on typed tables support. The idea is that you
> >> create a table out of a composite type (as opposed to the other way
> >> around, which is currently done automatically).
>
> Nice. Can we come up with a better name for the feature, though?
> "Composite Type Tables"? "Type-Table Inheritance"?
"Typed tables" is the official SQL standard name for the feature, and
it's also used in DB2 documentation. So I kind of would prefer to keep
it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-11 07:22:07 | Re: xpath improvement suggestion |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-11 06:58:19 | Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full |