Re: damage control mode

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-10 17:53:35
Message-ID: 1263146015.1339.40.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2010-01-10 at 01:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something*
> on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally
> considered to be beta quality. I don't think that really helps
> much though; it just means we need more time in beta.

Maybe we need to ponder for a minute what beta ought to mean for us.
With all the new processes and guidelines being established, the
transition criteria into and out of beta are in my mind pretty weakly
defined.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-10 17:55:28 Re: RADIUS authentication
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-01-10 17:40:54 Re: Streaming replication status