Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network

On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:33 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:12 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> >> Hey Andrew
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Windows came late to the buildfarm. According to the CVS log, the buildfarm
> >> > client was first checked in in Sept 2004, got initial Mingw support in Jan
> >> > 2005 and MSVC support in March 2007, when we finally got some of the tools
> >> > sorted out.
> >>
> >> Right - but the buildfarm isn't a feature being offered to end users.
> >>
> >
> > Neither is this. These people are developers or DBAs after all.
>
> I know I'm a little slower than normal this week as I've had some sort
> of virus, but say what? I was kinda under the impression that
> developers/DBAs are end users of PostgreSQL. They make up a
> significant percentage of people that I know than install, configure
> and use it.

My point is... if they are a developer or DBA, they aren't going to have
any trouble dealing with these issues.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.