From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
Date: | 2010-01-07 20:42:02 |
Message-ID: | 1262896922.6765.67.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:36 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:07 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hackers,
> >
> > I've posted a [plan] to implement PGAN][], a CPAN for PostgreSQL extensions. I've tried to closely follow the [CPAN philosophy][] to come up with a plan that requires a minimum-work implementation that builds on the existing PostgreSQL tools and the examples of the [CPAN][] and [JSAN][]. My hope is that it's full of [JFDI][]! I would be very grateful for feedback and suggestions.
>
> Whilst the aim is a noble one, glossing over 'it won't work on
> Windows' which is by far our most popular platform these days
Although I understand your point, this is debatable to the point of a
pointless point :P. The reason it seems like the most popular is that
the only way to get the windows version is to download it from .Org/EDB.
Linux/FreeBSD already has it in their own repositories.
I do believe that we need to support windows, but not everything will.
That is just the nature of it.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-07 20:43:10 | Re: true serializability and predicate locking |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2010-01-07 20:37:45 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |