Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks
Date: 2010-01-03 00:42:51
Message-ID: 1262479371.3542.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2010-01-02 at 17:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> As for the overhead, these queries are not zero-maintenance. I still
> think that the usefulness of tab completion here is pretty darn
> minimal,
> since most people are more likely to rely on default_do_language;

We really don't have any data on that, and it doesn't seem all that
likely to me.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-03 00:47:22 Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-03 00:38:26 Re: ssize_t vs win64