| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Maddox <ianmaddox(at)google(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Request: Revive the security-specific section |
| Date: | 2018-05-03 14:03:17 |
| Message-ID: | 126158a4-29ad-516d-9647-2d0371aaa62c@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 5/2/18 18:59, Ian Maddox wrote:
> Google Cloud Blog recently published a guide on securing DBs in the
> cloud
> <https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2018/04/best-practices-for-securing-your-Google-Cloud-databases.html>
> and tried to link to your latest docs on hardening Postgres, but all we
> could find is this doc from version 7
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.0/static/security.htm>.
That seems of dubious use. More than half the information on that page
is no longer applicable.
> It appears> that the knowledge from that page has been redistributed
across the
> manual in versions 8+, making it difficult to point to a single
> authoritative resource. I'm writing to request that a single section on
> security be revived in a future revision of the manual.
I see where you are coming from. However, I think security concerns
exist in every aspect of the system. So as a user when I'm dealing with
operating system integration, or schema design, or backups, or
replication, or monitoring, etc., then I want to know about the security
concerns on that subject.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-05-05 19:45:38 | Re: Request: Revive the security-specific section |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-05-03 12:53:09 | Re: Autocommit with Postgres 10 |