| From: | Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue |
| Date: | 2002-09-07 01:30:12 |
| Message-ID: | 126155134872.20020906223012@carcass.dhs.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Bruce,
Friday, September 6, 2002, 9:52:18 PM, you wrote:
BM> I am not any happier about it than you are. Your report is good because
BM> it is the first case where returning the wrong value actually breaks
BM> software. You may be able to justify adding a fix during beta by saying
BM> it is a bug fix.
Actually I think it must have happened with someone else, but they
must have quit using rules or something...
Actually I can't ensure security in the system without rules.
BM> Of course, someone is going to have to generate a patch and champion the
BM> cause. This stuff doesn't happen by magic.
I understand your point. I just was hoping to see more concern about
the issue by the developers... but that's been broken for months.
Unhappily I can't do it myself because it would take weeks to get
familiar with the inners of PostgreSQL...
Let's hope someone realize how serious is this and make a fix.
Thanks again...
-------------
Best regards,
Steve Howe mailto:howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-07 01:58:13 | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-07 00:55:17 | Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc |