| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql TABLE patch |
| Date: | 2007-09-26 03:42:14 |
| Message-ID: | 12608.1190778134@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-25-09 at 22:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I won't cry if this doesn't make it into 8.3, particularly
>> since there was some disagreement about it. But if you intend to make
>> it happen, the days grow short.
> My recollection is that the patch was okay as far as it went, but I'm
> hesitant to add yet another alternative to the already complex set of
> choices for returning composite types and sets from functions. If we
> just make TABLE() syntax sugar for the existing OUT function stuff we
> would avoid at least some of that complexity, but Pavel still prefers a
> distinct proargmode, last I heard.
OK, let's just hold this item for 8.4 then. It's way past time to get
8.3 out the door ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-09-26 04:15:03 | Re: top for postgresql (ptop?) |
| Previous Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2007-09-26 03:39:42 | Re: top for postgresql (ptop?) |