From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.1.4 |
Date: | 2002-01-24 14:57:57 |
Message-ID: | 12607.1011884277@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Is there anything in the v7.1.x BRANCH that warrants a v7.1.4 release?
According to CVS, the *only* stuff in the 7.1 branch since 7.1.3 is
2001-10-01 05:38 inoue
* src/: backend/executor/nodeTidscan.c, include/nodes/execnodes.h
(REL7_1_STABLE): Keep the contents of TIDs not the pointers. Tid
scan has been broken for 7.1.
2001-09-12 13:14 tgl
* src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c (REL7_1_STABLE): Back-patch
deadlock recovery fix into 7.1 tree, in case someone needs it.
The deadlock-recovery fix is somewhat interesting, but I hardly think it
warrants a 7.1.4.
There are other fixes in current sources that perhaps could be
back-patched if we wanted to expend the time to do it. I don't...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-24 15:43:10 | Re: 7.1.4 |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-01-24 14:57:44 | Re: 7.1.4 |