Re: enable-thread-safety defaults?

On tis, 2009-12-01 at 18:03 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > > 2009/12/1 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> > >> What are we going to do for build farm members who don't support
> > >> threading? Is someone going to manually update their configure flags?
> >
> > > Yeah, I think so.
> >
> > > Unless there's a whole lot of them, in which case we revert the patch.
> >
> > It would seem like we ought to try the one-liner patch Magnus proposed
> > (ie flip the default) and see what the effects are, before we go with
> > the much larger patch Bruce wrote.
>
> OK, done --- let the breakage begin. (I will be monitoring the build
> farm and will work with Andrew Dunstan on any issues.)

You have removed all the configure code that defined
ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY, but there is still lots and lots of code that
checks for #ifdef ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY. So this is is probably quite
broken at the moment.