| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New VACUUM FULL |
| Date: | 2009-12-05 18:56:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1260039363.19545.283.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 19:49 -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> > I tested a variety of situations during my review, and everything
> > worked
> > as I expected.
>
> Would there be a way for you to package the scenarios you tested into
> a suite?
Except for the simplest tests, they aren't easily moved to pg_regress.
For instance, how do you tell if a user table's relfilenode actually
changed? Easy to do manually, but tough to do with pg_regress.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-05 19:25:47 | Re: Cancelling idle in transaction state |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-12-05 18:28:04 | Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH] |