From: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Adrian Klaver" <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need help extripating plpgsql |
Date: | 2013-02-21 23:18:38 |
Message-ID: | 12599caae738d69af35ec9bbcf4b0bf6.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, February 21, 2013 16:02, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 02/21/2013 12:14 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> The current arrangement is not really satisfactory as it requires
>> either separate template databases for each userid granted the
>> DBCREATE role or the superuser role has to be granted in place of
>> the DBCREATE role.
>>
>>
>
> That is sort of the point of the template system, different templates
> for different situations.
>
Creating a new database from the system provided standard templates is
not what I would consider a different situation requiring a
specialized template for each and every user granted the DBCREATE
role. Requiring that seems to me to be busywork and a complete waste
of DBA resources.
If all the elements contained in the standard templates had their
ownerships changed to that of the owner of the new database then my
problem would never have arisen. I do not understand why this is not
the case. Is there a reason why this is so?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-02-22 00:47:37 | Re: Need help extripating plpgsql |
Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2013-02-21 22:35:39 | Re: Database corruption event, unlockable rows, possibly bogus virtual xids? Invalid backend server xid |