From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: operator exclusion constraints |
Date: | 2009-12-02 05:18:34 |
Message-ID: | 1259731114.3355.126.camel@jdavis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> For parity with unique constraints, I think that the message:
>
> operator exclusion constraint violation detected: %s
>
> should be changed to:
>
> conflicting key value violates operator exclusion constraint "%s"
Done, and updated tests.
> In ATAddOperatorExclusionConstraint, "streatagy" is misspelled.
Fixed.
> Other than that, it looks good to me.
Great, thanks for the detailed review!
Regards,
Jeff Davis
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
operator-exclusion-constraints-20091201.context.patch | text/x-patch | 102.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-02 05:24:04 | Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-12-02 05:11:22 | Re: SE-PgSQL patch review |