From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tim Watts <tim(dot)j(dot)watts(at)kcl(dot)ac(dot)uk>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql 8.4 GSSAPI auth with fallback to password prompting? |
Date: | 2013-03-25 14:31:30 |
Message-ID: | 12593.1364221890@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tim Watts (tim(dot)j(dot)watts(at)kcl(dot)ac(dot)uk) wrote:
>> I would have to respectfully take another point of view: that that
>> particular judgement is probably better placed with the sysadmin
>> rather than a blanket decision by the devs.
> It's not a blanket decision by any means- the current situation is that
> such an option doesn't exist. It's not "it exists, but we disabled it
> because we felt like it."
> Were someone to write the code to support such an option, it's entirely
> possible it'd get committed (though likely with strong caveats about its
> use in the documentation).
I'm not sure it would. Allowing a fallback would amount to a protocol
change, meaning that old clients might fail in strange ways. You'd
need a lot stronger case than has been made here to justify dealing
with that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Watts | 2013-03-25 14:37:02 | Re: Postgresql 8.4 GSSAPI auth with fallback to password prompting? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-03-25 13:25:57 | Re: Postgresql 8.4 GSSAPI auth with fallback to password prompting? |