Re: pgxs problem...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgxs problem...
Date: 2012-10-10 02:03:47
Message-ID: 12588.1349834627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/09/12 6:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've committed a patch for the first two things:
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd0ef304f8a306522983f3b4b06274fdc45beed8
>> ... but not having an AIX machine, I can't actually test it. Would
>> you verify it works?

> hmm, i've not worked with git much. whats the best way I can verify
> this? should I just run the patches against a 9.1.6 tarball or should
> I attempt a full checkout from git?

It's enough to apply the patch to a 9.1.6 tarball. If you go to that
page and click the "patch" button, you'll get a plain-text patch you
can feed to "patch -p1".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Ernst 2012-10-10 03:50:22 pg_upgrade not detecting version properly
Previous Message John R Pierce 2012-10-10 01:34:35 Re: pgxs problem...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-10-10 03:35:35 Re: embedded list
Previous Message John R Pierce 2012-10-10 01:34:35 Re: pgxs problem...