| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: warning message in standby |
| Date: | 2010-06-14 14:30:00 |
| Message-ID: | 12587.1276525800@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The correct log level for this message is LOG. End of discussion.
> Why?
Because it's not being issued in a user's session. The only place it
can go is to the system log, and if you use a level of WARNING or less,
it's likely to get filtered out by log_min_messages.
I'm totally unimpressed by the argument that log-filtering applications
don't know enough to pay attention to LOG messages. There are already a
lot of those that are quite important to notice.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-14 14:34:05 | Re: warning message in standby |
| Previous Message | Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais | 2010-06-14 14:18:04 | Re: Typo in plperl doc ? |