| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Python 3.1 support |
| Date: | 2009-11-20 06:04:43 |
| Message-ID: | 1258697083.17548.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tor, 2009-11-19 at 13:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> But in any case, my main concern here is that I don't want to have
> to predetermine which python version a user of Red Hat/Fedora will
> have to use. If they can only use one at a time, that's still a
> good bit better than not having a choice at all.
By the way, mod_wsgi supports Python 3 already (same patch as here, in
principle). From the Fedora wiki page, I gather that no one has really
looked into packaging that yet for Python 3, but if someone does, maybe
we can cross-inspire ourselves.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2009-11-20 06:12:30 | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-11-20 05:56:52 | Re: Syntax for partitioning |