Re: pgAdmin Icon

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rob Napier <rob(at)doitonce(dot)net(dot)au>, Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgAdmin Icon
Date: 2009-11-20 02:10:47
Message-ID: 1258683047.2851.4.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:55 +0900, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/20/09 6:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On fre, 2009-11-20 at 07:02 +1100, Rob Napier wrote:
> >> I suspect that the logos have not changed because the skills have not
> >> been
> >> available to create something better. Is this the case or is it simply
> >> that
> >> people really do like it the way it is?
> >
> > I really do like it the way it is.
>
> Surely we have something more useful to discuss than the logo?

Not to feed the fire but....

Logos are important. If the logo is unprofessional (I am not actually
casting an opinion, I don't use PgAdmin) then people are going to think
it is an unprofessional app.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> --Josh Berkus
>
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-11-20 02:34:52 Re: logo was: pgAdmin Icon
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-11-20 00:55:02 Re: pgAdmin Icon